That is what we see as the spark. We are able to attract a metal can or even a large delicately balanced wood plank with charges on a rubber rod. We explain this by noting, as we explained the electroscope, that the presence of charge creates an electric field. The electric field influences the distribution of charge within the metal can, or even on the atoms in the wood. A negative charge has the effect of drawing positive charge closer to it, and a positive charge draws negative charge closer to it.
The net effect is to create an attractive force. Electric fields are illustrated in the animation we access here. We observe electrons in the environment of an electric field caused by two much larger charged objects, one positive and one negative.
Note how a field is created by the charges. An electron "feels" the field and experiences a force whose magnitude depends on the strength of the field at the location of the electron. By convention, an electric field flows from positive charge to negative charge. Another website, Charges and Fields, is similar to the previous one except that here you can experiment by creating more positive, negative and neutral objects with charge and noting how they effect electrons in their environment.
Now look at electrons in orbit around an atomic nucleus as depicted in the Web demo here. This illustrates the similarity between the electric force and the gravitational force. Consider the analogy with gravitational potential energy.
How do you find density in the ideal gas law? Does ideal gas law apply to liquids? Impact of this question views around the world. You can reuse this answer Creative Commons License. We need to know that electrical energy is a kind of wave. If we don't know this, then we have a very serious learning barrier. Only then can learning continue. When you connect a light bulb to a battery, Electrical Energy moves from the battery to the bulb. This is a one-way flow. The battery loses energy and the bulb gains it.
Then the energy received by the bulb is turned into light. If this phenomenon is examined in great detail, we find that electrical energy is composed of wavse travelling along columns of electrons inside the wires, and the energy itself is contained in electromagnetic fields connected to those electrons. The energy did not travel in a circle. So, when you plug a lamp into a wall socket, you shouldn't imagine that the AC energy is a mysterious invisible entity traveling back and forth inside the wires.
Instead you should think of AC energy as a mysterious invisible flow that comes out of the outlet, runs along the outside of BOTH wires, then dives into the filament of the light bulb.
Your electric company is sending out long "sausages" of electrical energy, the wires are guiding them, and your appliances are absorbing them. Static and Current are two ways in which electrical charges can behave. If we said that Electrical Science is divided into two fields of research called Electrostatics and Electrodynamics, we would be correct. But aren't there different kinds of electricity?
Well please realize that the study of WATER is divided into Hydrostatics and Hydrodynamics, yet we don't go around claiming that "current water" is one type of water, while "static water" is a different type of water.
The same applies to electric charges. If you insist that "Static" and "Current" are two kinds of electricity, then please explain this: if positive and negative charges are forced to separate as they flow along a wire, then that wire becomes electro statically charged Yet the wire will cause hair to rise, and it can attract fur or lint Does this make your brain ache?
The key is the separation of the charges, and their "static- ness " is not important. For this reason, charges can exhibit both "static electricity" and "current electricity" at the same time.
This is not so terrible, since water supplies a good illustration: water can be pressurized and it can flow at the same time, so it falls under the subjects of "hydrostatics" and "hydrodynamics" simultaneously.
Fortunately we have not given the name "static water" to water that is pressurized. Maybe we should change the name of "Static electricity" to something sensible, like "charge imbalance", or "pressurized electricity.
Charges can flow, and opposite charges can be forced to separate, but this doesn't mean that the two KINDS of charge are "flowing electricity" and "separated electricity. Separation and flow are two electrical behaviors; they are not two "kinds of electricity. These are two separate kinds of events, they are not opposites. It has little to do with the separation of opposite charges. And though electric current really exists and electric charge really exists, there is no such material as either "current electricity" or "static electricity.
Most textbooks discuss a substance or energy called "current". They constantly talk about flows of current. Is it water, or is it "current? The same idea applies to electricity: electric current is a flowing substance, but the name of the substance is not "current. Another question: what if the English language had no word for "water", but instead we called it "current"?
What if we really believed that rivers were full of "current" which flowed? Wouldn't people tend to acquire many serious misconceptions about the nature of water? We might imagine that it vanishes whenever it stops flowing, since a halted current is A glass of water would seem very confusing, since the glass would be full of stationary "current. As far as elementary textbooks are concerned, we have no name for the stuff that flows inside of wires.
The stuff, when it flows, is properly called. Refer to advanced physics texts, and there we'll find its correct name: Charge. Instead they say that "current" flows. They say it over and over and over, and any students are very lucky if they avoid picking up the wrong idea that the charges vanish when the flow is halted.
Does the water in a pipe suddenly evaporate when you halt its flow? Worse, most books say that "current electricity" flows in wires. To this I say, "Is there a special kind of water called 'current water? The same answer applies to electricity: electricity can flow and electricity can stop, and a flow of electricity or charge is called an Electric Current, but there is no such thing as "current electricity.
If the sentence states that charge-flow is flowing, then that particular sentence is confusing the students and teaching them to believe that a substance called "current" exists. Electric current is actually a flowing motion of charged particles. The words "Electric Current" mean the same as "charge flow.
On the other hand, electric energy is different. It is made of waves in electromagnetic fields and it moves VERY rapidly. Electric energy moves at a different speed than electric current, so obviously they are two different things flowing in wires at the same time.
Unless we realize that two different things are flowing, we won't understand how circuits work. Indeed, we will have little grasp of basic electrical science. In an electric circuit, the path of the electric charges is circular, while the path of the energy is not. A battery can send electric energy to a light bulb, and the bulb changes electrical energy into light.
The energy does NOT flow back to the battery again. At the same time, the electric current is a circular flow, and the charges flow through the light bulb filament and all of them return to the battery. In a single wire, electric energy can even move continuously forward while the direction of the electric current is alternating back and forth at high frequency. Here's one way to clarify the muddled concepts: if electric current is like wind, then electrical energy is like some sound waves, and electrons are like the molecules of the air.
For example, sound can travel through a pipe if the pipe is full of air molecules, and electrical energy can flow along a wire because the wire is full of movable charges. Sound moves much faster than wind, correct? And electrical energy moves much faster than electric current for much the same reason. Air in a pipe can flow fast or slow, while sound waves always move at the same very high speed.
Charges in a wire can flow fast or slow, while electrical energy always flows along the wire at the same incredibly high speed. Whenever sound is flowing through a pipe, the air molecules in that pipe are vibrating back and forth.
When waves of AC electrical energy are flowing along a wire, the electrons in that wire are vibrating back and forth 60 times per second. Suppose that we were all taught that sound and wind are the same thing? This would prevent us from understanding wind or sound. They say that electric currents are a flow of energy, as if wind was really sound. It completely prevents us from understanding both electric current and energy flow.
For example, sound can flow inside an air-filled tube, while electrical energy always flows in the space outside of the wires, and does not travel along within the metal wires. However, electrical energy is coupled with compression waves in the electrons of the wire. Electron-waves travel inside the wires, yet the energy they carry is in the invisible fields surrounding the wires. Is it important for us to realize that wind is not sound? School books would cause harm if they taught us that wind is sound.
And if we want to understand circuits, we need a clear view of electric charge flow, and of electric energy flow. We need to be totally certain that they are two different things, and our textbooks teach us the exact opposite! Some books imply or even state outright that, whenever a battery is connected in a complete circuit, the charges flow only in the wires, and that no charges flow in the chemicals between the battery plates.
These books often contain a diagram of a battery, wires, and a light bulb. In any simple electric circuit, the path of the electric current is a complete circle. It is like a drive belit , and it has no starting point. It goes through all parts of the circuit including the battery, and including the. If there's one Ampere in the wires connected to the battery, then there's also a 1-Amp flow of charge in the electrolyte between the battery's plates. Where does this charge come from?
A battery does not supply charges, it merely pumps them. Whenever electric charge flows into one terminal of a battery, an equal amount of charge must flow THROUGH the battery and back out through the other terminal. The battery is a charge pump. Some books give an analogy with a circular track full of freight cars waiting to be filled with coal. This picture is wrong too. The energy in electric circuits is not carried by individual electrons.
Instead the electrons move very slowly while the electrical energy flows rapidly along the columns of electrons. The energy is carried by the circuit as a whole, not by the individual charged particles. Here's an analogy which may help explain it: imagine a wheel that's free to spin. For example, turn a bicycle upside-down in your mind. Give the front tire a spin. When you spin the wheel, your hand injects energy into the entire wheel all at once.
Now put your hand lightly against some part of the tire so the spinning wheel is slowed and stopped by friction.
Your hand gets hot. Your hand extracts energy from the entire wheel, all at once, and the whole wheel slows down. Finally perform both tasks at. Would it be right to tell students that the "Power" hand fills each rubber molecule with energy, that the molecules travel to the "Friction" hand and dump their energy, then they return empty to the "power" hand and get refilled? No, of course not! If this were true then the energy would be forced to travel only as fast as the rubber.
Your "friction" hand wouldn't experience any friction until those magically energized rubber molecules made their way around the rim. Part of the wheel would be spinning while part would be de-energized and unmoving, and this would be really a strange sight to see!
A flashlight circuit is like our bicycle wheel. The electrons in the copper circuit are like the rim of the wheel. They are like a drive belt inside the wires. The battery causes ALL the electrons in the loop of wire to begin moving. As soon as the battery moves the electrons, the distant lightbulb lights up.
The electrons moving into the bulb's filament are exactly the same as the ones moving out; the bulb doesn't change them or extract stored energy from them.
Did your hand alter the rubber tire as it rubbed on the bicycle wheel? No, it just slowed the whole wheel down. It extracted energy from the whole wheel, and was heated by friction. Same thing with the bulb, it slows ALL the electrons down throughout the entire circuit, and in this way extracts energy from the whole circuit as it lights up. In discussing this misconception with teachers, I find that they see nothing wrong with teaching it to their students!
After all, the kids instantly grasp the "freight cars with coal" story since it is very visible and it offers a sensible explanation. What more can we ask? Yet there, is a serious problem here: electrons flow slowly, and in AC circuits they don't flow at all, instead they wiggle.
In order to really understand electric circuits in the more advanced classes, a student must UNLEARN the seductive freight-cars analogy. It freezes their understanding of electricity at the elementary-school level.
Yes, if the kids will never have any need to understand how electricity REALLY works, then the freight-cars analogy is fine. The kids can memorize it, teachers can test them for it, and everybody is happy.
But if the kids grow up to become scientists and engineers and technical people, then the freight-cars analogy causes them harm. Unfortunately, it only causes FUTURE harm, so the K-6 educators never encounter the negative effects of the misconceptions they've installed in the kids' minds.
In that case the freight cars are moving back and forth but not progressing forwards. How can they deliver their coal to the far end of the track? I suspect that teachers encounter this problem, and rather than recognizing that "freight cars" is a misconception, they instead pile another misconception: the wrong idea that electrons in wires flow at the speed of light. After all, if the coal-filled freight cars traveled INSTANTLY to the far end of the track, then dumped their coal, then traveled instantly back, that would be alternating current.
But electric current is actually a very slow flow of charges, and during AC those "freight cars" only wiggle back and forth a few feet on their tracks. The bicycle-wheel analogy has no problem explaining AC. Just wiggle the bicycle wheel back and forth instead of spinning it continuously. The wiggling wheel will rub upon the distant "friction" hand, and will heat it up.
Energy can essentially travel instantly across the bicycle wheel, even though the wheel itself rotates slowly. Energy can travel instantly between the hands even if the wheel moves back and forth instead of spinning. The "filled freight cars" analogy seems seductively appropriate when used to explain Direct Current.
However, when explaining Alternating Current the analogy breaks down completely. Each freight car wiggles back and forth, so how can those energy-filled buckets move from the "battery" to the "light bulb?
The analogy doesn't work, and students who have learned the analogy will find it impossible to understand AC. Again, this is fine if the kids have no hopes of entering any kind of technical career; if their science learning will cease after fifth grade How about an analogy regarding this analogy grin! How do sound waves work? Ask yourself this. Would it be OK to teach kids that your vocal chords place energy into air molecules, then the air molecules zoom out of your mouth at MPH and eventually crash into the ears of distant listeners?
I would think that any author who use this kind of explanation should be ashamed. Yes, the explanation "works", and it is easy for the kids to grasp. But it is wrong: sound is carried by waves in the air, not by air molecules launched at immense velocities out of your mouth.
And any kid who believes this "launched molecules" sound explanation will have terrible difficulties should they ever have need to understand how sound REALLY works.
All of this is an analogy for wires and circuits: electrical energy is wave energy; electrical energy moves along the columns of electrons like sound moves through the air, and when electrical energy flows across a circuit, the electrons DON'T flow along with it.
The word "charge" has more than one meaning, and the meanings contradict each other. The "charge" in a battery is energy chemical energy , while the "charge" that flows in wires is part of matter, it is electron particles.
Millikan then exposed the droplets to X-rays, which ionized molecules in the air and caused electrons to attach to the oil droplets, thus making them charged. The top and bottom of the chamber were attached to a battery, and the potential difference between the top and bottom produced an electric field that acted on the charged oil drops.
Adjusting the voltage perfectly, Millikan was able to balance the force of gravity which was exerted downward with the force of the electric field on the charged particles which was exerted upward , causing the oil droplets to be suspended in mid-air. A uniform electric field is created between them. The ring has three holes for illumination and one for viewing through a microscope.
Special oil for vacuum apparatus is sprayed into the chamber, where drops become electrically charged. The droplets enter the space between the plates and can be controlled by changing the voltage across the plates.
Millikan then calculated the charge on particles suspended in mid-air. His assumptions were that the force of gravity, which is the product of mass m and gravitational acceleration g , was equal to the force of the electric field the product of the charge q and the electric field E :.
Since he already knew the mass of the oil droplets and the acceleration due to gravity 9. Although the charge of each droplet was unknown, Millikan adjusted the strength of the X-rays ionizing the air and measured many values of q from many different oil droplets. In each instance, the charge measured was a multiple of 1. Thus, it was concluded that the elementary electric charge was 1. The results were very accurate.
The calculated value from the Oil-Drop Experiment differs by less than one percent of the current accepted value of 1. The Oil-Drop Experiment was tremendously influential at the time, not only for determining the charge of an electron, but for helping prove the existence of particles smaller than atoms.
At the time, it was not fully accepted that protons, neutrons, and electrons existed. Privacy Policy. Skip to main content. Electric Charge and Field. Search for:. Key Takeaways Key Points A proton is a positively charged particle located in the nucleus of an atom. An elementary charge — that of a proton or electron — is approximately equal to 1. Unlike protons, electrons can move from atom to atom. If an atom has an equal number of protons and electrons, its net charge is 0.
If it gains an extra electron, it becomes negatively charged and is known as an anion. If it loses an electron, it becomes positively charged and is known as a cation. Key Terms nucleus : the massive, positively charged central part of an atom, made up of protons and neutrons. Properties of Electric Charges Electric charge is a fundamental physical property of matter that has many parallels to mass.
Learning Objectives Describe properties of electric charge, such as its relativistic invariance and its conservation in closed systems. Charges can be positive or negative, and as such a singular proton has a charge of 1. Electric charge, like mass, is conserved. The force generated by two charges is of the same form as that generated by two masses and, like gravity, force from an electrical field is both conservative and central.
Electric charge is a relativistic invariant. That is, charge unlike mass is independent of speed. Whereas the mass of a particle will exponentially rise as its speed approaches that of light, charge will remain constant. Key Terms coulomb : In the International System of Units, the derived unit of electric charge; the amount of electric charge carried by a current of 1 ampere flowing for 1 second.
Charge Separation Charge separation, often referred to as static electricity, is the building of space between particles of opposite charges.
Learning Objectives Identify factors that can create charge separation. Key Takeaways Key Points Because electrons are labile i.
This phenomenon is often commonly referred to as static electricity. Charge separation can be created by friction, pressure, heat, and other charges. Charge separation can reach a critical level, whereat it is discharged.
Key Terms discharge : the act of releasing an accumulated charge static electricity : an electric charge that has built up on an insulated body, often due to friction nucleus : the massive, positively charged central part of an atom, made up of protons and neutrons.
Polarization Dielectric polarization is the phenomenon that arises when positive and negative charges in a material are separated. Learning Objectives Identify two ways polarization can occur on the molecular level.
0コメント